Know exactly what to do next in every deal.

$2.47M of your $4.60M commit has a flagged risk, against a gap to quota of $390K. Three patterns:\n- **Single-Threaded Champions — $1.29M, 3 opportunities.** Meridian's champion has been silent 23 days during a customer restructuring, and Vantiv's sole contact left the company Aug 30.\n- **Security Review Not Started — $698K, 2 opportunities.** Corbin Aerospace has never had its InfoSec status populated. Meridian's is Pending Approval with no direct contact made to the reviewer.\n- **Repeatedly Slipped Close Dates — $480K, 2 opportunities.** Bellweather Energy's close date lapsed Sep 4 after slipping twice. Halberd has had legal redlines outstanding 19 days.\nThree deals in your commit carry no flagged risk at all: Northgate, Atwater, and Redmond, together $1.21M.\nSo: you're $390K short and the deals holding you up are worth six times that. Meridian is the largest deal inside the first pattern.\nSources: 30 days of activity across 12 opportunities, through Sep 16.\n---\n[Elaborate on the biggest risk]\nSingle-Threaded Champions — $1.29M across 3 opportunities.\n## What was actually said\n**Elena Vasquez, Aug 24:** asked whether the EMEA seat count could be split across two fiscal years — nine days before the restructuring was announced. She was signalling budget pressure before she went quiet.\n**Tom Bergeron, Aug 24:** confirmed rollout planning is finished for the North America scope. The domestic half is ready; the EMEA half is what's exposed.\n## What this changes\nMeridian may not be one $512K decision. On the split Elena described, it's a $290K North America rollout that can close this quarter and a $222K EMEA scope that probably can't. Nobody has put that option to the customer.\n## This week\n**Dana Whitfield —** take the phased structure directly to David Kwan. It's the only version of this deal that survives the reorg intact.\n**Ravi Menon —** escalate to Vantiv's procurement contact rather than waiting for a named replacement.

The phased split converts an at-risk $512K into a likely $290K, and it came out of a meeting nobody revisited.

The work is real. The deal isn't closeable on its current path.\n## Strong\nCustomer-initiated in April. Technical validation completed Jul 9, positive.\n47 activities across 164 days. Nobody has been lazy here.\n## Missing\nEconomic Buyer and Decision Process both blank. Scorecard 21.4%.\nOne meeting with David Kwan, the economic buyer, on May 14. Nothing in four months.\nMartin Feld, CFO, never contacted. On a Jun 18 call Elena Vasquez said anything above $250K needs his sign-off. This deal is $512K, closing Oct 23.\n## Changed underneath it\nEngagement fell from 82 to 34 in thirty days. No meeting since Aug 24, none scheduled.\nMeridian announced a restructuring of EMEA field operations Sept 2. Public filings confirm roughly 600 roles affected, including Elena's org. The expansion scope is inside it.\nSo: not as it stands. A deal that was on track until the customer's org moved underneath it, with a buying group never built wide enough to survive that.\nSources: 33 emails and 14 meetings through Sep 16.\n---\n[Show me who we've never talked to]\nSix people in the buying group. Two are engaged.\n## Never contacted\n**Martin Feld, CFO** · no score · highest buying power; anything above $250K needs his sign-off. The largest gap.\n**Priya Nandakumar, Director IT Security** · 4 · InfoSec Pending Approval, never spoken to directly.\n## Contacted, not engaged\n**Rachel Ostrowski, Procurement Lead** · 2 · surfaced Sept 4, one unanswered email Sept 9.\n**David Kwan, SVP Operations** · 12 · one meeting, May 14.\n## Engaged\n**Elena Vasquez, VP Field Operations** · 74 · silent 23 days.\n**Tom Bergeron, Manager Service Delivery** · 68 · no budget authority.

Two of the four unengaged can stop this deal outright. Neither has met anyone on your team.

Dana Whitfield. Not because of Meridian specifically, but because Meridian is the third instance of the same pattern.\n- **Coverage.** 2.1 engaged stakeholders per deal against a team average of 3.8. Three of her four open deals are single-threaded.\n- **Qualification.** Economic Buyer blank on Meridian and Pinnacle Rail. Pinnacle advanced to Stage 4 — Proposal without technical validation.\n- **The pattern.** All three of her last three losses closed without a single economic-buyer meeting.\nSo: this isn't a Meridian conversation, it's a qualification-discipline conversation that Meridian happens to be expensive enough to force.\nSources: 4 open opportunities and 3 closed-lost, through Sep 16.\n---\n[Give me the coaching plan]\nOpen with the pattern, not the deal. Three losses, zero economic-buyer meetings in any of them, and the same gap now on a $512K commit deal. Meridian becomes the example rather than the accusation.\n## This week\n- First contact with Martin Feld before the Oct 23 close date.\n- Direct outreach to Priya Nandakumar to open the InfoSec review.\n- Economic Buyer populated on Meridian and Pinnacle Rail.\n## The standing change\nNo deal advances past Stage 3 — Validation without a named economic buyer who has met someone.

Framing: "Your activity is high and your coverage is thin. Those are different problems and you only have one of them."

Backstory delivers robust

Read the AI buying guide

Book a demo

answers like this to sales leaders just like you.

Book a demo and start winning more, even in complex selling motions.