How Seismic turned unreliable data into a 6% close rate lift

Overview

Seismic builds sales enablement software that helps frontline teams ramp faster, find content quicker, and stay aligned on process. They know what good sales execution looks like - they sell to sales orgs every day. Which made it harder to accept that their own internal data wasn't good enough to coach from.

The problem wasn't effort. Sales leaders were trying to coach. Reps were trying to plan. RevOps was trying to manage pipeline. But without accurate activity data flowing into Salesforce, every one of those efforts was built on a shaky foundation.

[testimonial]

[list#base]

Before Backstory

• No single source of truth - activity data spread across multiple input sources
• Sales leaders coaching on anecdotal evidence, not real engagement data
• New reps couldn't see what 'good' looked like - no visibility into successful patterns
• Account planning done in offline docs - disconnected, inconsistent, rarely updated
• Limited insight into rep coverage across accounts, deals, and customer contacts

[/list]

[tag#Use case 01]

Data foundation and activity capture

Getting to a source of truth - and trusting what's in it

Seismic's core problem was that the data in Salesforce didn't reflect what was actually happening. Emails, calls, meetings - none of it was reliably captured or correctly matched to the right accounts and opportunities.

Backstory's Data Foundation gave Seismic 98% matching accuracy across the tools reps use every day. Every activity type got captured automatically and associated correctly. The result was 150,000 additional contacts added to the database, and for the first time, leaders could ask 'are we doing the right things?' and actually get a data-backed answer.

[testimonial]

[list#brand]

AFTER BACKSTORY

• 98% activity matching accuracy across all rep tools
• 150,000 additional contacts captured in Salesforce
• Full activity capture across calls, emails, and meetings - automatic, not manual
• Leaders can identify engagement gaps and deal risks with real data

[/list]

[tag#Use case 02]

Account planning and deal qualification

Replacing offline docs with a live, shared source of truth inside Salesforce

Seismic's account planning process existed mostly in offline documents - slide decks and spreadsheets that reps updated before reviews and then set aside. There was no consistency in format, no connection to live pipeline data.

ClosePlan moved account planning into Salesforce and kept it there. Org charts, account context, deal qualification via MEDDIC - all standardized, all live, all in the same place. And with AI-powered insights surfacing risk factors and engagement gaps, deals that used ClosePlan closed at a 6% higher rate than those that didn't.

[list#img]

AFTER BACKSTORY

• 6% higher close rates on deals that used ClosePlan versus those that didn't
• Account plans standardized in format and location - always live inside Salesforce
• Sales engineering and leadership can review accounts without a pre-call briefing
• MEDDIC qualification embedded directly into deal workflows

[/list]

What Seismic achieved

Seismic came in wanting better account planning and cleaner pipeline management. What they got was a reliable data foundation that made every other sales motion work better - coaching, coverage planning, deal qualification, and cross-functional collaboration all improved because the underlying data finally could be trusted.

The 6% close rate lift on ClosePlan deals is the headline number, but the compounding effect is what matters: reps spending less time on manual updates, leaders coaching from facts instead of gut feel, and new hires able to see what winning looks like from day one.

[testimonial]